Question(d) Show that, if and are non-zero vectors belonging to , then and can't be both orthogonal and parallel
Studdy Solution
STEP 1
What is this asking? Can two non-zero 3D vectors be *both* perpendicular *and* parallel? Watch out! Remember what parallel and orthogonal *really* mean!
STEP 2
1. Define parallel and orthogonal vectors
2. Explore the parallel case
3. Explore the orthogonal case
4. Combine and conclude
STEP 3
Alright, let's **define** what it means for two vectors to be parallel.
Two vectors and are parallel if one is a scalar multiple of the other.
That means for some non-zero scalar .
Think of it like this: they point in the same direction (or exactly opposite directions), just maybe with different lengths!
STEP 4
Now, what does it mean for two vectors to be orthogonal?
It means they are perpendicular to each other, forming a right angle.
Mathematically, this means their dot product is zero: .
STEP 5
Let's imagine and are parallel.
So, .
Let's write as and as .
Then, .
STEP 6
Now, let's *also* assume they're orthogonal.
This means their dot product is zero.
Let's substitute our expression for from the parallel case: .
STEP 7
Remember that the dot product of a vector with itself is the square of its magnitude: .
So, we have .
STEP 8
We're given that is non-zero.
This means its magnitude, , is also non-zero, and so is .
The only way for to be true when is *not* zero, is if .
STEP 9
But wait!
If , then , meaning is the zero vector.
But we were told *both* vectors are non-zero!
We've reached a contradiction!
STEP 10
This means our initial assumption—that and are *both* parallel and orthogonal—must be false!
Boom!
STEP 11
Therefore, two non-zero vectors in cannot be both parallel and orthogonal.
Was this helpful?