QuestionAnna Bischoff
12/03/24 10:44 AM
Question 13, 9.1.33-T
Part 2 of 4
HW Score: of 14 points
Points: 0 of 1
Save
The weights (in pounds) of eight vehicles and the variabilities of their braking distances (in feet) when stopping on a dry surface are shown in the table. At , is there enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear correlation between vehicle weight and variability in braking distance on a dry surface?
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline Weight, & 5910 & 5360 & 6500 & 5100 & 5890 & 4800 & 5700 & 5870 \\
\hline Variability, & 1.72 & 1.99 & 1.92 & 1.55 & 1.69 & 1.50 & 1.57 & 1.70 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
Setup the hypothesis for the test.
Calculate the test statistic.
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Studdy Solution
STEP 1
1. We are testing for a linear correlation between vehicle weight and variability in braking distance.
2. The significance level is .
3. The null hypothesis is that there is no linear correlation ().
4. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a linear correlation ().
STEP 2
1. Setup the hypothesis for the test.
2. Calculate the test statistic.
3. Determine the critical value and compare it with the test statistic.
4. Make a decision based on the comparison.
STEP 3
Setup the hypothesis for the test:
STEP 4
Calculate the test statistic. The test statistic is given as:
STEP 5
Determine the critical value for a two-tailed test at with degrees of freedom. Use a t-distribution table or calculator to find the critical value.
STEP 6
The critical value for and 6 degrees of freedom is approximately .
STEP 7
Compare the test statistic with the critical values. Since , we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
There is enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear correlation between vehicle weight and variability in braking distance on a dry surface.
Was this helpful?