Math  /  Data & Statistics

Question```latex A teacher gave two versions of a quiz, form 1 and form 2, to random samples of sociology students. She wanted to test whether the mean scores would be different if they were given to all sociology students. Here are the raw data.
Form 1 scores: 90, 83, 81, 73, 70, 67, 63, 63, 59, 57, 56, 55, 54, 50, 49, 32, 24, 6.
Form 2 scores: 100, 100, 100, 98, 91, 88, 73, 68, 66, 64, 61, 61, 61, 60, 49, 43, 22.
\begin{enumerate} \item[(a)] Compute the following, rounding to two decimal places. \begin{itemize} \item t=t= \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \item pp-value == \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \end{itemize} \item[(b)] Circle the words that make an appropriate conclusion, using α=0.05\alpha=0.05. REJECT / DON'T REJECT the NULL / ALTERNATIVE hypothesis. There IS / IS NOT statistically significant evidence that the mean scores would be THE SAME / DIFFERENT. \end{enumerate}
Skill: Estimate xˉ1xˉ2\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2} and the pp-value from a sketch of the sampling distribution.
For each completed sampling distribution for the difference of two means: \begin{enumerate} \item[(a)] Was it a one or two-tailed test? \item[(b)] Write the hypotheses. \item[(c)] What was the SEEsT? \item[(d)] What was the value of xˉ1xˉ2\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}? \item[(e)] Estimate the pp-value (roughly). \item[(f)] Should the null hypothesis be rejected? YES / NO \end{enumerate}
\begin{enumerate} \item[4.] \begin{enumerate} \item[(a)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(b)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(c)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(d)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(e)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(f)] YES / NO \end{enumerate} \item[5.] \begin{enumerate} \item[(a)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(b)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(c)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(d)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(e)] \_\_\_\_\_\_ \item[(f)] YES / NO \end{enumerate} \end{enumerate} ```

Studdy Solution

STEP 1

What is this asking? We're comparing two sets of quiz scores to see if there's a *real* difference in average scores, or if it's just random chance! Watch out! Don't mix up the two groups, and make sure we're using the right test in StatCrunch!
Also, let's be super careful with rounding.

STEP 2

1. Calculate Stats for Form 1
2. Calculate Stats for Form 2
3. Perform the t-test
4. Interpret the Results
5. Answer Additional Questions

STEP 3

Let's **add up** all the Form 1 scores: 90+83+81+73+70+67+63+63+59+57+56+55+54+50+49+32+24+6=102290 + 83 + 81 + 73 + 70 + 67 + 63 + 63 + 59 + 57 + 56 + 55 + 54 + 50 + 49 + 32 + 24 + 6 = 1022.
Now, **divide** by the number of scores, which is **18**, to get the **mean**: 10221856.78 \frac{1022}{18} \approx 56.78 .

STEP 4

Use a calculator or StatCrunch to find the **standard deviation** of Form 1 scores.
We get approximately 21.5521.55.
This tells us how spread out the scores are.

STEP 5

Let's **add up** all the Form 2 scores: 100+100+100+98+91+88+73+68+66+64+61+61+61+60+49+43+22=1225100 + 100 + 100 + 98 + 91 + 88 + 73 + 68 + 66 + 64 + 61 + 61 + 61 + 60 + 49 + 43 + 22 = 1225.
Now, **divide** by the number of scores, which is **17**, to get the **mean**: 12251772.06\frac{1225}{17} \approx 72.06 .

STEP 6

Use a calculator or StatCrunch to find the **standard deviation** of Form 2 scores.
We get approximately 22.6522.65.
This shows the spread of these scores.

STEP 7

Input the Form 1 and Form 2 scores into separate columns in StatCrunch.

STEP 8

Go to *Stat* -> *T Stats* -> *Two Sample* -> *With Data*.
Select the columns for Form 1 and Form 2.
Since we're testing for a *difference* (not specifically higher or lower), choose the "not equal" alternative hypothesis.
Click *Compute*.

STEP 9

StatCrunch gives us t2.15t \approx -2.15 and p0.04p \approx 0.04.

STEP 10

Our pp-value (0.040.04) is less than our significance level, α=0.05\alpha = 0.05.

STEP 11

Since p<αp < \alpha, we **reject** the **null hypothesis**.
This means there's statistically significant evidence that the mean scores on the two forms *are* different!

STEP 12

This was a **two-tailed test** because we were looking for *any* difference, not just one form being higher or lower.

STEP 13

Null Hypothesis H0H_0: μ1=μ2\mu_1 = \mu_2 (The means are the same).
Alternative Hypothesis HaH_a: μ1μ2\mu_1 \ne \mu_2 (The means are different).

STEP 14

The SEEsT is shown in the StatCrunch output.

STEP 15

We found xˉ156.78\bar{x}_1 \approx 56.78 and xˉ272.06\bar{x}_2 \approx 72.06, so the difference is 56.7872.0615.2856.78 - 72.06 \approx -15.28.

STEP 16

The StatCrunch output gives us the pp-value directly.

STEP 17

Yes, we reject the null hypothesis.

STEP 18

t2.15t \approx -2.15 p0.04p \approx 0.04 **REJECT** the **NULL** hypothesis.
There **IS** statistically significant evidence that the mean scores would be **DIFFERENT**.
4. (a) Two-tailed (b) H0:μ1=μ2H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2, Ha:μ1μ2H_a: \mu_1 \ne \mu_2 (c) From StatCrunch output. (d) 15.28\approx -15.28 (e) 0.04\approx 0.04 (f) YES
5. Same as 4.

Was this helpful?

Studdy solves anything!

banner

Start learning now

Download Studdy AI Tutor now. Learn with ease and get all help you need to be successful at school.

ParentsInfluencer programContactPolicyTerms
TwitterInstagramFacebookTikTokDiscord